You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The only remaining item in this list is the proposal to rename Spot_ID in the RNA table (a breaking change that could be bundled with others that we are considering).
My initial thought is that ultimately this is a Spot with X, Y and Z coordinates, similar to DNA spots and others. I expect there could be certain operations that could be performed on spots that do not care whether it comes from RNA, DNA or other sources. Additionally, the RNA identity is well expressed in the table. Therefore, I'd suggest to keep as is.
Let's clarify in the docs that Spot_ID needs to be unique across both core table (DNA spots) and rna table (RNA spots). As a reminder, uniqueness of identifiers is required across one experiment (an entire set of core + additional tables, for one replicate).
Rationale
A spot is a spot (RNA, DNA or others). Any pipeline that works with spots in general should be applicable to this table too.
Spot-related tables (spot quality, spot biological data, spot demultiplexing) are generic and could be used to describe RNA spots too.
RNA spots can be associated with traces or cells, but not with single DNA spots (double-check this). Therefore, having a Spot_ID column in the rna table is not ambiguous.
The following items are missing and I think they would be useful to have:
-- TO-DO
-- TO-DO
The following items are missing and might need to be removed from google sheet:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: