Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for SCS 0.37 kHz and 2.5 kHz #6

Open
dsilhavy opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Support for SCS 0.37 kHz and 2.5 kHz #6

dsilhavy opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@dsilhavy
Copy link
Contributor

dsilhavy commented Oct 7, 2021

Support for Subcarrier spacing with 0.37 kHz and 2.5 kHz

@dsilhavy dsilhavy added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 7, 2021
@dsilhavy dsilhavy added this to the IBC 21 milestone Oct 7, 2021
@johannmika johannmika changed the title Support for SCS 0.37 kHz and 15 kHz Support for SCS 0.37 kHz and 2.5 kHz Oct 29, 2021
@dsilhavy dsilhavy changed the title Support for SCS 0.37 kHz and 2.5 kHz Support for SCS 0.37 kHz and 15 kHz Nov 18, 2021
@dsilhavy dsilhavy changed the title Support for SCS 0.37 kHz and 15 kHz Support for SCS 0.37 kHz and 2.5 kHz Nov 19, 2021
@dsilhavy dsilhavy removed this from the 1.2.1 milestone Nov 24, 2022
kuehnhammer added a commit to kuehnhammer/rt-mbms-modem that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2023
@dsilhavy
Copy link
Contributor Author

From @kuehnhammer slides

2.5 kHz / 100µs CP

  • High-speed mobility scenarios
  • Signaled by eNodeB via SIB 13�
  • Implementation: done

~ 0.37 kHz / 300µs CP

  • Larger ISD
  • Signaled by eNodeB via SIB 13 (include RS pattern choice)
<subcarrierSpacingMBMS-r16>
    <kHz0dot37/>
</subcarrierSpacingMBMS-r16>
<timeSeparation-r16>
<sl2/>
</timeSeparation-r16>
  • Implementation: in progress, need to change sync module to deliver 3ms MBSFN slots

@dsilhavy dsilhavy added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Nov 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants