-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unrepair Math-78 by JKali #103
Comments
This is not an issue with flacoco. The location that is patched through GZoltar is the following:
Flacoco identifies this line, with the same suspiciousness value: The difference is in the "priority". For GZoltar, this line is the 47th, whereas for Flacoco it is the 60th (cropped out the lines that appear after): GZoltar:
Flacoco:
|
There is a flaky test in that program (https://github.com/martinezmatias/astor/runs/3851808288?check_suite_focus=true#step:8:77). That could be the reason. I will exclude that test from the analysis. |
Did that return any new information? I thought the issue was with patch synthesis on this one, no? |
Math-78 is now working with JGenProg. I ignore a (flaky?) test case that is failing and it should not (org.apache.commons.math.random.RandomAdaptorTest) Now I am inspecting why JKali does not repair it: the patch to be found is here: https://github.com/Spirals-Team/defects4j-repair/blob/master/results/2015-august/Math/78/Kali/stdout.log#L29 https://github.com/martinezmatias/astor/runs/3949793045?check_suite_focus=true#step:8:139 |
great news!
|
jGenProg arrives to repair with Gzoltar, but not with Flacoco (which does not fail)
Logs for the two executions, first gzoltar, then Flacoco
https://github.com/martinezmatias/astor/runs/3676644911?check_suite_focus=true#step:8:3314
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: