Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump version number of JSON to 1.0 #102

Open
aforsythe opened this issue Jan 13, 2018 · 8 comments
Open

Bump version number of JSON to 1.0 #102

aforsythe opened this issue Jan 13, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

@aforsythe
Copy link
Collaborator

After all existing JSON issues are closed the version number of the JSON should be bumped up to 1.0.

@KelSolaar
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good!

@miaoqi
Copy link
Contributor

miaoqi commented Jan 17, 2018

@KelSolaar @aforsythe where is the latest specification for JOSN 1.0? also what should we do with the "license" field?

@KelSolaar
Copy link
Contributor

The spec is for now still in the README file: https://github.com/ampas/rawtoaces#json-schema-for-spectral-datasets

I strongly think this is a required/mandatory field, actually even more than last time we talked about it with people here.

@miaoqi
Copy link
Contributor

miaoqi commented Jan 19, 2018

Hi, any thoughts for the "license" field?

Thanks!

@KelSolaar
Copy link
Contributor

@miaoqi as I said above:

I strongly think this is a required/mandatory field, actually even more than last time we talked about it with people here.

@miaoqi
Copy link
Contributor

miaoqi commented Jan 20, 2018

@KelSolaar I undersand. Any suggestions on what it should be like?

@KelSolaar
Copy link
Contributor

Oh well, it is Academy duty to decide what is the appropriate license for its data :)

@aforsythe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aforsythe commented Jan 20, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants