-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump version number of JSON to 1.0 #102
Comments
Sounds good! |
@KelSolaar @aforsythe where is the latest specification for JOSN 1.0? also what should we do with the "license" field? |
The spec is for now still in the README file: https://github.com/ampas/rawtoaces#json-schema-for-spectral-datasets I strongly think this is a required/mandatory field, actually even more than last time we talked about it with people here. |
Hi, any thoughts for the "license" field? Thanks! |
@miaoqi as I said above:
|
@KelSolaar I undersand. Any suggestions on what it should be like? |
Oh well, it is Academy duty to decide what is the appropriate license for its data :) |
After all existing JSON issues are closed the version number of the JSON should be bumped up to 1.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: