Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement auro-formvalidation repo #173

Closed
jordanjones243 opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #174
Closed

Implement auro-formvalidation repo #173

jordanjones243 opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #174
Assignees

Comments

@jordanjones243
Copy link
Contributor

jordanjones243 commented Apr 5, 2024

General Support Request

Support request

We want to keep our validation methods consistent across all form elements.

Possible Solution

Implement the auro-formvalidation repo that is currently being added to all of our form elements.

@jordanjones243 jordanjones243 added not-reviewed Issue has not been reviewed by Auro team members Type: Feature New Feature auro-combobox labels Apr 5, 2024
@jordanjones243 jordanjones243 self-assigned this Apr 5, 2024
@jordanjones243 jordanjones243 removed the not-reviewed Issue has not been reviewed by Auro team members label Apr 5, 2024
@jordanjones243 jordanjones243 linked a pull request Apr 5, 2024 that will close this issue
6 tasks
blackfalcon pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2024
# [1.10.0](v1.9.14...v1.10.0) (2024-05-10)

### Bug Fixes

* **border:** update border styles after for new input version ([31f6c85](31f6c85))
* **events:** update help text event and event docs ([d027521](d027521))

### Features

* **validitation:** implement form validation repo [#173](#173) ([09d9e35](09d9e35))

### Performance Improvements

* **library:** add library runtime util functionality for custom components ([a20ecbd](a20ecbd))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants