You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On the positive side, we've eliminated all of the value mismatch errors signaled by arm-tv on the LLVM unit test suite! (Except for those triggered by several known LLVM bugs.)
On the other hand, I'm still getting a fairly large number of "source more defined than target" alarms. If you don't want to look at these now, we can punt, but I thought I'd report one that seems pretty innocuous.
Note that this problem does not stem from int2ptr, it seems to be something totally different. Confusingly, the CEX mentions function did not return! even though the memcpy() that seems to trigger the problem is marked willreturn. Anyway I don't know what's going on.
On the positive side, we've eliminated all of the value mismatch errors signaled by arm-tv on the LLVM unit test suite! (Except for those triggered by several known LLVM bugs.)
On the other hand, I'm still getting a fairly large number of "source more defined than target" alarms. If you don't want to look at these now, we can punt, but I thought I'd report one that seems pretty innocuous.
Note that this problem does not stem from int2ptr, it seems to be something totally different. Confusingly, the CEX mentions
function did not return!
even though the memcpy() that seems to trigger the problem is marked willreturn. Anyway I don't know what's going on.Here's src:
and tgt:
oddly, it seems to be the memset() that is decisive, if I comment it out, this is a refinement.
also, it's definitely the case that this problem is NOT related to int2ptr, because this tgt is not a refinement:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: