Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

R7B6 Dateline with Nest #71

Open
drieg opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

R7B6 Dateline with Nest #71

drieg opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 6 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@drieg
Copy link

drieg commented Dec 9, 2024

ICON External Parameter Request

Instructions

  1. Give this issue a meaningful title.
  2. Replace PASTE_YOUR_REQUEST_HERE with your request that you copied to clipboard:
{
  "extpar": {
      "igrid_type": 1,
      "iaot_type": 1,
      "ilu_type": 1,
      "ialb_type": 1,
      "isoil_type": 1,
      "itopo_type": 1,
      "lsgsl": false,
      "lfilter_oro": false,
      "lurban": false
  },
  "icontools": {
    "grid_level": 5,
    "grid_root": 7,
    "centre": 78,
    "subcentre": 255,
    "lspring_dynamics": true,
    "maxit": 1000,
    "beta_spring": 0.95,
    "outfile": "ICON-Dateline",
    "domains": [
      {
        "region_type": 3,
        "center_lon": -170.0,
        "center_lat": 22.0,
        "hwidth_lon": 20.0,
        "hwidth_lat": 6.5,
        "lrotate": false
      },
      {
        "region_type": 3,
        "center_lon": -160.0,
        "center_lat": 22.0,
        "hwidth_lon": 10.0,
        "hwidth_lat": 5.0,
        "lrotate": false
      }
    ]
  }
}
  1. Click on "Preview" to verify that the JSON format of your request is correctly formatted and displayed within a code block.
  2. Click on "Submit new issue".

Extpar Data Request will now process your data based on the request you provided here. Once the processing is successful, it will post a link in this issue.
The processed data will be available under that link for up to 7 days.

If you encounter any problems, please add the label Static Badge to the issue. Make sure you post all relevant information from the logfiles in the issue directly.

Status Labels

Labels reflect the current state of your request:

Static Badge - Your request is currently under processing. Please wait for further updates.

Static Badge - Your request has been successfully processed. You can download your data using the provided link.

Static Badge - Unfortunately, your request could not be processed. Please refer to the log files in the zip file at the download link for more details.

Static Badge - Your request was aborted. This might be due to a timeout. Please try again or contact support if the problem persists.

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2024
@jenkins-apn
Copy link

Your data is ready for up to 7 days under this link.

@drieg
Copy link
Author

drieg commented Dec 9, 2024

@jonasjucker I tried to use this data set in ICON. I should point out that didn't try any of the previous ones in ICON, up to now was only eyeball comparison. There seems to be something odd with the lakes (i.e. there are lakes but the depth is -1 for the full domain):

    25 : 1111-01-11 00:00:00       0    50280       0 :      0.0000  4.7655e-06    0.079963 : FR_LAKE
    26 : 1111-01-11 00:00:00       0    50280       0 :     -1.0000     -1.0000     -1.0000 : DEPTH_LK

I also see this behavior in other datasets. Is there something wrong with the extpar namelists?

@drieg
Copy link
Author

drieg commented Dec 9, 2024

Sorry, my bad. I checked only a similar case. In the other cases I do not see this error. So this seems somehow to be related to the chosen region and resolution I guess. Has this every happened before?

@jonasjucker
Copy link
Contributor

No I did not receive similar reports.
I think usually people do not really check Extpar output.

@drieg
Copy link
Author

drieg commented Dec 9, 2024

Well, ICON fails. I guess that I hit a spot with too 'high' resolution where some lakes are resolved without depth information and noone has ever tried this resolution for this part of the world. I will try R3B7N8, if my theory is correct, R3B7 should work and as soon as I add the R3B8 nest it will crash

@drieg
Copy link
Author

drieg commented Dec 10, 2024

I can confirm that R3B7 works and R3B8 does not work. So I guess no one ever tested this region before and there is something wrong with the original dataset, the interpolation or, most likely, the consistency check (since depth_lk should have a dummy value in case of fr_lake above a certain threshold).

I will forward this to my extpar and flake colleagues...

@jonasjucker jonasjucker added bug Something isn't working and removed completed data request labels Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants