Further categorization of Examples

[navidcy]

At the moment we have:

• Documented Examples
• Contributed Examples

But the "Documented Examples" have grown a lot in numbers. And they vary in level of difficulty. I suggest we further split them into, e.g.,

• Documented Examples
  • Simple
  • Elaborate
• Contributed Examples

or something like that...?

[navidcy]

Another potential category is

• MOM5
• MOM6
• Some other model that we also like to use
• ...

[julia-neme]

I think I like categorising by model, because I think it might be asking a bit too much of people that work with just one to contribute a generalised example that will work for both (as suggested in #190). For example, if I have only used mom5 I might not know what aspect of the code needs to be tweaked to be applied in mom6 (coordinate names, vertical coordinates, variables names). For example, I don't think the SWMT are calculated similarly.

If we do want a general code applicable to either model, is that something that NCI could do? Like we submit our example for our model, and they generalise it?

[navidcy]

Well... what you suggesting here @julia-neme might be the realistic option.

This could be something to discuss in the beginning of the hackathon. Do we have many people who will be contributing non-MOM5 code?

[julia-neme]

I'm sure there will be. I'm using it, Hangyu, Christina, and surely others :)

[navidcy]

Great!

[navidcy]

I created the MOM5 and MOM6 labels. Perhaps they'll come handy?

[adele-morrison]

Yes, we will have lots of people spinning up with PanAntarctic MOM6 analysis this year. It would be great for those people to have access to as good notebooks as the MOM5 folk do. Maybe as a start, we could work on replicating the existing MOM5 notebooks for MOM6 (should be relatively fast), or at least producing a mapping of variable names for MOM6-newbies. Hopefully we could finish most of this during the hackathon day. Then (or in parallel) we can try to reduce them to a single set of notebooks that would work with either model? I'm guessing this may be a longer task and continue on beyond the hackathon.

…

On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 13:07, Julia Neme ***@***.***> wrote: I'm sure there will be. I'm using it, Hangyu, Christina, and surely others :) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#182 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACA44UZOKQ6KSRWCADBLYTTWS5F6ZANCNFSM6AAAAAASKWDE6Y> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[navidcy]

I created the MOM5 and MOM6 labels. Perhaps they'll come handy?

I admit that the emojis associated with the labels imply something about who is the past and who is the future.

[adele-morrison]

Could be addressed at the same time as Issue #246.