You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, there are some versions missing in the doc. The version popup in the bottom right looks like that:
As you can see, the last named version is the version 1.3.1. I think this should go up to the last release (1.6.0).
Moreover, selecting "stable" leads to the 1.4.1 doc, and "latest" leads to 1.5.0 (both of them should lead to 1.6.0 right?). I'm not sure latest and stable are meant to be different? I feel like the "stable" should point to 1.6.0, and "latest" to the latest build (branch develop). However, if we're not planning to point to the latest build, I feel that only one "stable" and "latest" should be present.
Imo, all versions should be explicitly listed in this popup (regardless of "stable" or "latest"), so that anyone working with a specific version can easily access the corresponding doc.
Ideally, I think that this would be ideal:
with "stable" (or "latest" if you prefer?) and "1.6.0" linking to the same page.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, there are some versions missing in the doc. The version popup in the bottom right looks like that:

As you can see, the last named version is the version 1.3.1. I think this should go up to the last release (1.6.0).
Moreover, selecting "stable" leads to the 1.4.1 doc, and "latest" leads to 1.5.0 (both of them should lead to 1.6.0 right?). I'm not sure latest and stable are meant to be different? I feel like the "stable" should point to 1.6.0, and "latest" to the latest build (branch develop). However, if we're not planning to point to the latest build, I feel that only one "stable" and "latest" should be present.
Imo, all versions should be explicitly listed in this popup (regardless of "stable" or "latest"), so that anyone working with a specific version can easily access the corresponding doc.
Ideally, I think that this would be ideal:

with "stable" (or "latest" if you prefer?) and "1.6.0" linking to the same page.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: