We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I run lofreq call-parallel with different numbers for --pp-threads and get different vcf output:
lofreq call-parallel
--pp-threads
lofreq call-parallel --pp-threads 1 --verbose --ref 'reference.fa' --out variants.vcf --min-cov 1 --max-depth 1000000 --min-bq 6 --min-alt-bq 6 --min-mq 0 --max-mq 255 --min-jq 0 --min-alt-jq 0 --def-alt-jq 0 --sig 0.01 --bonf dynamic reads.bam
##FILTER=<ID=min_snvqual_33,Description="Minimum SNV Quality (Phred) 33"> ##FILTER=<ID=min_snvqual_38,Description="Minimum SNV Quality (Phred) 38">
lofreq call-parallel --pp-threads 2 --verbose --ref 'reference.fa' --out variants.vcf --min-cov 1 --max-depth 1000000 --min-bq 6 --min-alt-bq 6 --min-mq 0 --max-mq 255 --min-jq 0 --min-alt-jq 0 --def-alt-jq 0 --sig 0.01 --bonf dynamic reads.bam
##FILTER=<ID=min_snvqual_38,Description="Minimum SNV Quality (Phred) 38"> ##FILTER=<ID=min_snvqual_38,Description="Minimum SNV Quality (Phred) 38">
Wondering if this is expected/desired.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I run
lofreq call-parallel
with different numbers for--pp-threads
and get different vcf output:lofreq call-parallel --pp-threads 1 --verbose --ref 'reference.fa' --out variants.vcf --min-cov 1 --max-depth 1000000 --min-bq 6 --min-alt-bq 6 --min-mq 0 --max-mq 255 --min-jq 0 --min-alt-jq 0 --def-alt-jq 0 --sig 0.01 --bonf dynamic reads.bam
lofreq call-parallel --pp-threads 2 --verbose --ref 'reference.fa' --out variants.vcf --min-cov 1 --max-depth 1000000 --min-bq 6 --min-alt-bq 6 --min-mq 0 --max-mq 255 --min-jq 0 --min-alt-jq 0 --def-alt-jq 0 --sig 0.01 --bonf dynamic reads.bam
Wondering if this is expected/desired.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: