-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Resolve Measure 8 and Component 11 data definition and quality issues. #6
Comments
Removing the mitigation as it may not be a valid assumption. Per the conversation in slack:
|
Update the component 11 criteria to check that contraception provided was "0-3 days"
|
grosscol
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 19, 2020
grosscol
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 19, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Problem
The original definition of C11 is
sum(contra_choice != "unknown" & contra_choice == imm_method)
. That is: count the number of cases where contraception choice was not unknown and contraception choice matched the immediate method.The problem is that it doesn't account for how the values of the fields have been interpreted by the analyst or abstractors. 90% of the counts for the above definition of C11 also occur in a row where
counseling
isFALSE
. This leads me to believe that the value of "other" was used in the data set when it should be "unknown".Current Mitigation
The following definition is currently used for C11 to handle the lack of counseling. Which impacts Measure 8:
Solution
This needs to be addressed in the following ways:
Definitions
Data Corrections
Alternatively: Data could be re-uploaded with conformant use of other in contra_choice and imm_method fields. Effectively fixing the data issue at the source.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: