You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There seems to be some challenges and differences with 1) here and here which make it not as straightforward as it might seem. Also we would have to verify that a "layer 2" protocol can interoperate at the "identify" layer. In other words, Plugins operate as Apps on Pubsub messages, like Ping operates on Request Response. If I have a chat program running on Pubsub, can I advertize it as libp2p/plugin/postr/1.0.0?
But for 2) we would have to determine where to advertise the CID, which is nicely taken care of at 1)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Associated with #1, there needs to be a consistent ways for peers to identify the plugins they are using. Couple of options:
There seems to be some challenges and differences with 1) here and here which make it not as straightforward as it might seem. Also we would have to verify that a "layer 2" protocol can interoperate at the "identify" layer. In other words, Plugins operate as Apps on Pubsub messages, like Ping operates on Request Response. If I have a chat program running on Pubsub, can I advertize it as
libp2p/plugin/postr/1.0.0
?But for 2) we would have to determine where to advertise the CID, which is nicely taken care of at 1)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: