Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SUGGESTION] Packing Escrowed Assets #276

Open
Zackaery opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[SUGGESTION] Packing Escrowed Assets #276

Zackaery opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Zackaery
Copy link

Hi DurtyFree,

I’m reaching out to suggest a feature that could be really helpful for managing encrypted clothing assets. Currently, I’m working with multiple packs of encrypted clothing—about 10 different packs—and it can be challenging to sort and organize these files effectively.

While I know it’s possible to pack all the assets together and then manually separate the .ydd files into their own resource folders, this process becomes cumbersome when trying to remember which files belong to which pack.

It would be fantastic if the tool could allow us to import an asset escrowed folder and remember the original file names. Then, when building the project, it could export these assets into their respective folders automatically, while maintaining the current naming convention and ensuring the .ymt files still work as intended.

I think this would be very beneficial for those of us managing multiple packs of encrypted assets. Do you think this could be a possible addition?

Thanks for considering this!

@DurtyFree DurtyFree added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 28, 2024
@DurtyFree
Copy link
Owner

Something I will consider maybe for the future but as of now I rather hope clothing creators stop encrypting their clothes because it simply doesnt make sense

@joelemanoel
Copy link

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants