You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have a situation where we are required to operate Monaco from within a secured environment where the Monaco client is connecting to the DT tenant via an array of multiple ActivateGates in the same ActiveGate group with the same Network Zone.
We would like the Monaco client to operate similar to the OneAgent (e.g. --set-server xxx) where the client can initiate traffic through the first ActiveGate and if that fails, it would try the second ActiveGate and then if all AG's were unavailable, try the open internet connection to the DT tenant.
Of course, we could implement our own internal load balancer for this, but it seems natural to find a similar functionality to the OneAgent connectivity via multiple ActiveGates.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
We have a situation where we are required to operate Monaco from within a secured environment where the Monaco client is connecting to the DT tenant via an array of multiple ActivateGates in the same ActiveGate group with the same Network Zone.
We would like the Monaco client to operate similar to the OneAgent (e.g. --set-server xxx) where the client can initiate traffic through the first ActiveGate and if that fails, it would try the second ActiveGate and then if all AG's were unavailable, try the open internet connection to the DT tenant.
Of course, we could implement our own internal load balancer for this, but it seems natural to find a similar functionality to the OneAgent connectivity via multiple ActiveGates.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions