You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The FMTHIST compsets blow-up of the box using mpas, which @gdicker1 tracked down to missing values in the real world inic files for the 120 km and 480 km grids:
The issue seems to be that the ~80 km model top in L93 is well above the ~60 km CFSR top used to create the inic. One solutions is to use the ERA5 model level dataset, which has an ~80 km top and only requires extrapolation into the top most layer of L93 mpas. New inic's could be generated using betacast or the mpas inic generator.
I have not checked whether the analytic ic inic's are similarly problematic:
What happened?
The FMTHIST compsets blow-up of the box using mpas, which @gdicker1 tracked down to missing values in the real world inic files for the 120 km and 480 km grids:
The issue seems to be that the ~80 km model top in L93 is well above the ~60 km CFSR top used to create the inic. One solutions is to use the ERA5 model level dataset, which has an ~80 km top and only requires extrapolation into the top most layer of L93 mpas. New inic's could be generated using betacast or the mpas inic generator.
I have not checked whether the analytic ic inic's are similarly problematic:
What are the steps to reproduce the bug?
Run FMTHIST with
mpasa120_mpasa120
ormpasa480_mpasa480
.What CAM tag were you using?
cam6_4_038
What machine were you running CAM on?
CISL machine (e.g. cheyenne)
What compiler were you using?
Intel
Path to a case directory, if applicable
No response
Will you be addressing this bug yourself?
Yes, but I will need some help
Extra info
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: