Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maniac - Conditional Branch: Right after load is considered as false when loading a save from the load menu in Maniac, but is considered as true when doing so in EasyRPG #3099

Closed
Mimigris opened this issue Sep 26, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Mimigris
Copy link

Player platform:

Windows, 64 bits continuous build of the Player.

Describe the issue in detail and how to reproduce it:

When using the Conditional Branch: Right after load in the Maniac Patch, it is considered as true right when used on startup or when loading a save that was done just before the conditional branch with the Load command. For some reason, the Maniac patch will not consider it as true if you loaded a save with the load menu and not with the load command, a bug that EasyRPG does not currently replicate.

@Ghabry
Copy link
Member

Ghabry commented Sep 26, 2023

Should this be really replicated? Imo a "wrong" implementation does not hurt here.

@Mimigris
Copy link
Author

Should this be really replicated? Imo a "wrong" implementation does not hurt here.

As long as it doesn't break games I think it can be kept as-is, similar to #3068 , it also make more sense to have it like that. I think it's still useful to have Maniac bugs or discrepancies be listed somewhere, similar to how we have one for RPG_RT bugs. Maybe it would make more sense to have everything of this kind on one issue?

@Ghabry
Copy link
Member

Ghabry commented Sep 26, 2023

please make this a comment here #1818

@Ghabry Ghabry closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 26, 2023
@Ghabry Ghabry added the WontFix label Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants