Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pruning should not look at location names to determine which ones are inconsistant #63

Open
magoorden opened this issue Aug 5, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@magoorden
Copy link
Contributor

The theoretical definition of error states and inconsistant states do not care about the label given to a state. Thus the location label in an automaton should not matter, but currently it does.

In the example below, a user has given one location the name inc (for some unknown reason). But this location is completely consistant, as one can delay infinitely long.
Screenshot 2022-08-05 at 11 09 00

When pruning is applied on this example, the edge labeled with a! is removed, see below.
Screenshot 2022-08-05 at 11 08 43

@Brandhoej Brandhoej added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants