Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

output from failing test not as readable/useful as in original Python Page Objects framework #9

Open
mmaypumphrey opened this issue Sep 28, 2011 · 0 comments

Comments

@mmaypumphrey
Copy link

See http://i.imgur.com/QRRZ3.png for an image of the output from one of my failing tests in the old Python Page Objects framework (bottom) and in the new Py.Saunter framework (top). I prefer the old framework's output for two reasons:

  1. The line of code that caused the failure looks just like I entered it when displayed by the old framework. In the new framework, it looks like some low-level debugger output, and is hence, much harder to read.
  2. The test case that failed is fairly clearly identified in the old framework via its docstring--"Search for 'NDA'". In the new framework, one has to look into logs/latest.xml to find any identifying information.

Is there any way that Py.Saunter can be tweaked/configured to make the default output better in these two areas?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant