You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On 3 Jul 2017, at 13:21, Daniel Mietchen ***@***.***> wrote:
The above search currently gives no results for me.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
On 3 Jul 2017, at 14:15, Daniel Mietchen ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes, confirming that it works now. Thanks!
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
I would like to present the following search:
https://search.datacite.org/works?query=media:chemical\/x\-gaussian*+SubjectScheme:inchikey+subject:XZYDALXOGPZGNV-UHFFFAOYSA-M+media:chemical\/x\-mnpub*
as an example of FAIR metadata associated with a FAIR dataset. The metadata from one of the two hits can be inspected at
https://data.datacite.org/application/vnd.datacite.datacite+xml/10.14469/HPC/2635
and exploits the element from the DataCite metadata schema to enhance the FAIR attributes of the dataset.
https://search.datacite.org/works/10.14469/HPC/2635 shows the media types associated with this dataset, again part of the FAIR attributes.
My question is whether such subject-specific FAIR enhancement should be used by communities as a mechanism for achieving FAIRness?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: