You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
By design of the approach, there are some inconsistencies between WebGui form fields and STAC json names in the record.
This is due to agreed conversion from stac field convention/standards to shortened/improved/more intuitive WebGui names (see D4.2 for further reference). This can complicate debugging but improve user friendliness.
What wood explain these differences is to
publish the conversion table from D4.2 to a more prominent space (FiC RtD)
add a simple and understandable description to all WebGui fields (in light grey), this can be UC driven and handled like codelist changes upon demand
Attached are some examples:
Organisations <> providers
Organsation <> organisation_name (??)
Name <> organisation (??)
cell components <> band_name
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
By design of the approach, there are some inconsistencies between WebGui form fields and STAC json names in the record.
This is due to agreed conversion from stac field convention/standards to shortened/improved/more intuitive WebGui names (see D4.2 for further reference). This can complicate debugging but improve user friendliness.
What wood explain these differences is to
Attached are some examples:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: