You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I comment out the nb_op_update calls in vrf_update_state the messages go away:
static void vrf_update_state(struct vrf *vrf)
{
if (!vrf->state || !vrf_notify_oper_changes)
return;
/*
* Remove top level container update when we have patch support, for now
* this keeps us from generating 2 separate REPLACE messages though.
*/
nb_op_updatef(vrf->state, "id", "%u", vrf->vrf_id);
nb_op_update(vrf->state, "active", CHECK_FLAG(vrf->status, VRF_ACTIVE) ? "true" : "false");
}
Version
latest master
How to reproduce
Create a vrf and enable it. Look at the log files.
Expected behavior
No error messages
Actual behavior
error messages
Additional context
There comes a time when you must recognize that Llama's are pretty awesome
Checklist
I have searched the open issues for this bug.
I have not included sensitive information in this report.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Creating a vrf and establishing it always generates these yang error messages:
When I comment out the nb_op_update calls in vrf_update_state the messages go away:
Version
How to reproduce
Create a vrf and enable it. Look at the log files.
Expected behavior
No error messages
Actual behavior
error messages
Additional context
There comes a time when you must recognize that Llama's are pretty awesome
Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: