Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nhrpd: fix dont consider incomplete L2 entry (backport #18078) #18112

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2025

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link

@mergify mergify bot commented Feb 12, 2025

Sometimes, NHRP receives L2 information on a cache entry with the 0.0.0.0 IP address. NHRP considers it as valid and updates the binding with the new IP address.

Feb 09 20:09:54 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x2 cache used 0 type 4
Feb 09 20:10:35 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4
Feb 09 20:10:48 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: del-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4
Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: who-has 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr (unspec) nud 0x1 cache used 1 type 4
Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QVXNM-NVHEQ] Netlink: update binding for 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 from c 162.251.180.10 peer.vc.nbma 162.251.180.10 to lladdr (unspec)
Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 0.0.0.0 nud 0x2 cache used 1 type 4
Feb 09 20:11:30 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 0.0.0.0 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4

Actually, the 0.0.0.0 IP addressed mentiones in the 'who-has' message is wrong because the nud state value means that value is incomplete and should not be handled as a valid entry. Instead of considering it, fix this by by invalidating the current binding. This step is necessary in order to permit NHRP to trigger resolution requests again.


This is an automatic backport of pull request #18078 done by Mergify.

Sometimes, NHRP receives L2 information on a cache entry with the
0.0.0.0 IP address. NHRP considers it as valid and updates the binding
with the new IP address.

> Feb 09 20:09:54 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x2 cache used 0 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:35 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:48 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: del-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: who-has 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr (unspec) nud 0x1 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QVXNM-NVHEQ] Netlink: update binding for 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 from c 162.251.180.10 peer.vc.nbma 162.251.180.10 to lladdr (unspec)
> Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 0.0.0.0 nud 0x2 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:11:30 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 0.0.0.0 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4

Actually, the 0.0.0.0 IP addressed mentiones in the 'who-has' message is
wrong because the nud state value means that value is incomplete and
should not be handled as a valid entry. Instead of considering it, fix
this by by invalidating the current binding. This step is necessary in
order to permit NHRP to trigger resolution requests again.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 3202323)
@donaldsharp donaldsharp merged commit 57c1528 into dev/10.3 Feb 12, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
@Jafaral Jafaral deleted the mergify/bp/dev/10.3/pr-18078 branch February 26, 2025 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants