We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It'd be nice to have syntactic sugar for optional/nullable types:
type Foo { bar: String | Null, // Replace this... baz: ?String, // with this! }
Similar to flow or Swift or Kotlin optionals.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is similar to typescript, and we could make it String? but what do you do if you have String | Numer?.
String?
String | Numer?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
It'd be nice to have syntactic sugar for optional/nullable types:
Similar to flow or Swift or Kotlin optionals.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: