Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Robustness Information in Documentation #194

Open
mhellmeier opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Add Robustness Information in Documentation #194

mhellmeier opened this issue Jan 31, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
component: watermarker Watermarker Library documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@mhellmeier
Copy link
Member

🚀 Feature Request

Current Problem

The robustness problem is described in the upstream issue #20.

Proposed Solution

Update Trendmark documentation with recommendations for robustness (for example, suggest using the SizedCRC32Watermark if robustness is important and mention the trade-offs).

Additional Context

Comment from @hnorkowski:

Further analysis methods could be implemented as static method in Trendmark. The extracting methods of (Jvm)Watermarker could be extended by another parameter trashing: Bool that defines if all Trendmarks which produce an error or warning are thrown away.

@mhellmeier mhellmeier added component: watermarker Watermarker Library documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component: watermarker Watermarker Library documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants