Replies: 1 comment
-
I think we should be okay on our end. We include ESMA_cmake in GCHP so we'll get that new module when we update ESMA_cmake (unless I've misunerstanding something here). Thanks for the ping. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This is a question/discussion for @rmontuoro (and maybe @LiamBindle?).
Soon-ish, I will be including a new file,
esma_cpack.cmake
in our ESMA_cmake repo. Now, because of ecbuild, I can't just "hide" it inside of ouresma.cmake
omnibus file where it wouldn't matter. Rather, I'll have to add to the end of MAPL'sCMakeLists.txt
file a la:Where those last two lines are the important ones. Now, my hope is that maybe the
OPTIONAL
is enough to get by, but there is stuff in CMakeLists that @rmontuoro added like:Now, I'll work with @weiyuan-jiang to try it out with UFS first, but I thought I'd lean on @rmontuoro's experience and knowledge to see if you can think of more CMake protection that might be needed?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions