We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
schmidt.stability(wtr=c(30,10),depths=c(0,10),bthA=c(100,2),bthD=c(0,10)) [,1] [1,] 119.3527 schmidt.stability(wtr=c(10,30),depths=c(10,0),bthA=c(100,2),bthD=c(0,10)) [,1] [1,] -2.658799e-11
very different answer because the order of the depths was switched around. Still should yield the same result.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One way to deal with this is to require depths to be a monotonically increasing vector (error when it is not?)
Sorry, something went wrong.
If its out of order, could we just order the data first thing in the function? Might take roughly the same amount of time as checking.
Also, does this order issue affect other functions? Could check and sort in the other functions as well if yes.
This also affects thermo.depth().
No branches or pull requests
very different answer because the order of the depths was switched around. Still should yield the same result.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: