You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
URN is basically only used in Germany, and even here only as an outlandish phenomenon. I would put this on a low priority. We should check, how many publications in Wikidata have a URN.
I agree that the global focus should not be ignored, and the urn was just meant as an example and it can be also ignored
I think that broadly we need to look at what kind of identifiers are most commonly used and should support them.
My focus would try to automate as much possible to find the identifiers as much as possible for editors to decrease the manual identifier selection, which will make the plugin more usable.
I also think, Wiki data is a good place to start that was in the application too.
Let's may be discuss this internally, if it should stay a focus longer-term more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
2022-03-14 @withanage
In the current example , there is only for the extraction of dois.
Are there any plans to also index non-doi content, which comes from other sources e.g. urns ?
https://www.dnb.de/DE/Professionell/Services/URN-Service/urn-service_node.html#doc187234bodyText2
2022-03-22 @GaziYucel
At the moment only DOI and URL extraction is supported. URN will be added, but not planned at the moment.
2022-03-23 @hauschke
URN is basically only used in Germany, and even here only as an outlandish phenomenon. I would put this on a low priority. We should check, how many publications in Wikidata have a URN.
2022-03-23 @withanage
I agree that the global focus should not be ignored, and the urn was just meant as an example and it can be also ignored
I think that broadly we need to look at what kind of identifiers are most commonly used and should support them.
My focus would try to automate as much possible to find the identifiers as much as possible for editors to decrease the manual identifier selection, which will make the plugin more usable.
I also think, Wiki data is a good place to start that was in the application too.
Let's may be discuss this internally, if it should stay a focus longer-term more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: