You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Bug: Missing Input Validator in validate_and_prep_inputs
Expected Behavior
The validate_and_prep_inputs method should include an input validator to ensure that all required columns in the input DataFrame are present and contain valid data types before proceeding with further processing. If an invalid column name or data type is detected, a descriptive error message should be raised, specifying the issue and potential solution.
Current Behavior
Currently, the validate_and_prep_inputs method only checks for the existence of the action_id column and adds it if missing. It does not perform comprehensive validation on other required columns or their data types. This can lead to unexpected behavior or errors during subsequent processing steps if the input DataFrame is not correctly formatted. It only raises an error if the required columns are missing but not when their values are empty. It also coerces the required columns into an object type which should be updated to ensure that they always have a str type.
Possible Solution
Implement an input validator within the validate_and_prep_inputs method. This validator should check for the presence of all required columns, as defined by the class, and also validate the data types of the entries within those columns. If validation fails, raise a ValueError with a detailed message explaining the error, the problematic column(s)/rows, and suggested corrective actions.
Steps to Reproduce
Create a Pandas DataFrame with missing or incorrect data types for required columns, such as 'eval_id', 'action_type', 'action_input', etc. in the evaluations.py tool.
Instantiate the Evaluations class and call the from_dataframe method, passing the DataFrame.
Observe that no validation error is raised even when the required columns contain empty or invalid data, unexpected rows exist, or their data type/values does not match the expected values.
Context (Environment)
This issue can cause problems when processing evaluation datasets. Without proper input validation, incorrect is frequently being passed and causing errors downstream. Users can't troubleshoot on their own due to lack of clarity that the dataframe filling is the actual issue. Adding validation ensures data integrity and helps prevent issues later in the evaluation pipeline.
Detailed Description
The missing input validation makes the validate_and_prep_inputs method vulnerable to malformed input DataFrames. This can lead to unexpected behavior during evaluation runs. A robust validation step is needed to check not only for the presence of required columns, but also for empty or invalid values and correct data types within those columns. This will improve the reliability and robustness of the Evaluations class and the validate_and_prep_inputs method, and allow users to be more self-suficient while troubleshooting.
Possible Implementation
Within the validate_and_prep_inputs method, before any other processing, implement a validation check. This check should:
Verify presence of required columns: Ensure all columns listed in self.required_columns are present in the input DataFrame.
Check for empty values: Validate that the entries in the required columns are not empty ("", None, np.nan). If they are empty, raise a ValueError with a message specifying the affected column(s).
Validate data types/values: Confirm that the data types of values in required columns match the expected types and formatting. If a mismatch is found, raise a ValueError specifying the column and expected type. Also, ensure the data type of the required columns is changed from object to str to int.
Validate rows: Confirm that the rows don't contain invalid standards (ie. double tool call, playbook call when we have only one playbook, etc).
Example code snippet for implementing dtype validation:
REQUIRED_COLUMNS_TYPES= {
'eval_id': str,
'action_type': str,
'action_input': str,
# ... other required columns and types
}
forcol, expected_typeinREQUIRED_COLUMNS_TYPES.items():
ifnotall(isinstance(val, expected_type) forvalindf[col]):
raiseValueError(f"Column '{col}' must contain values of type {expected_type}") # noqa: E501# add example code to change required column type from `object` to `str`forcolinREQUIRED_COLUMNS_TYPES.keys():
df[col] =df[col].astype(str)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bug: Missing Input Validator in
validate_and_prep_inputs
Expected Behavior
The
validate_and_prep_inputs
method should include an input validator to ensure that all required columns in the input DataFrame are present and contain valid data types before proceeding with further processing. If an invalid column name or data type is detected, a descriptive error message should be raised, specifying the issue and potential solution.Current Behavior
Currently, the
validate_and_prep_inputs
method only checks for the existence of theaction_id
column and adds it if missing. It does not perform comprehensive validation on other required columns or their data types. This can lead to unexpected behavior or errors during subsequent processing steps if the input DataFrame is not correctly formatted. It only raises an error if the required columns are missing but not when their values are empty. It also coerces the required columns into anobject
type which should be updated to ensure that they always have astr
type.Possible Solution
Implement an input validator within the
validate_and_prep_inputs
method. This validator should check for the presence of all required columns, as defined by the class, and also validate the data types of the entries within those columns. If validation fails, raise a ValueError with a detailed message explaining the error, the problematic column(s)/rows, and suggested corrective actions.Steps to Reproduce
evaluations.py
tool.Evaluations
class and call thefrom_dataframe
method, passing the DataFrame.Context (Environment)
This issue can cause problems when processing evaluation datasets. Without proper input validation, incorrect is frequently being passed and causing errors downstream. Users can't troubleshoot on their own due to lack of clarity that the dataframe filling is the actual issue. Adding validation ensures data integrity and helps prevent issues later in the evaluation pipeline.
Detailed Description
The missing input validation makes the
validate_and_prep_inputs
method vulnerable to malformed input DataFrames. This can lead to unexpected behavior during evaluation runs. A robust validation step is needed to check not only for the presence of required columns, but also for empty or invalid values and correct data types within those columns. This will improve the reliability and robustness of theEvaluations
class and thevalidate_and_prep_inputs
method, and allow users to be more self-suficient while troubleshooting.Possible Implementation
Within the
validate_and_prep_inputs
method, before any other processing, implement a validation check. This check should:self.required_columns
are present in the input DataFrame.""
,None
,np.nan
). If they are empty, raise a ValueError with a message specifying the affected column(s).object
tostr
toint
.Example code snippet for implementing dtype validation:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: