Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How should desired orientation be expressed in solveIK()? #57

Open
rcywongaa opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

How should desired orientation be expressed in solveIK()? #57

rcywongaa opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@rcywongaa
Copy link

rcywongaa commented Jun 26, 2023

From https://files.hebi.us/docs/cpp/cpp-3.5.1/classhebi_1_1experimental_1_1arm_1_1Arm.html#aa4eb194bc441c71efdcf7f6e20f5178e)

Eigen::VectorXd hebi::experimental::arm::Arm::solveIK(
    const Eigen::VectorXd& initial_positions,
    const Eigen::Vector3d &	target_xyz,
    const Eigen::Vector3d &	end_tip 
) const

What is the interpretation of end_tip?

If I set end_tip = [1, 1, 1], does that mean the end effector will point at [1,1,1] in world frame? Or is it a rotation of [1,1,1] along the end effector x, y, z axis?

Similarly, from https://files.hebi.us/docs/python/2.7.2/hebi/py_api.html?highlight=endeffector_so3_objective#hebi.robot_model.endeffector_so3_objective

robot_model.endeffector_so3_objective(weight: float = 1.0)

In what frame is the orientation specified in?

@rcywongaa rcywongaa changed the title What is the interpretation of end_tip argument in solveIK()? How should desired orientation be expressed in solveIK()? Jun 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant