Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address video tutorials not matching current examples workflow #74

Open
lbianchi-lbl opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 5 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed Priority:High High Priority Issue or PR User support

Comments

@lbianchi-lbl
Copy link
Contributor

lbianchi-lbl commented Sep 21, 2023

  • A short-term solution would to add disclaimers to the video description saying that something along the lines of "This video tutorial might be out-of-date and not reflect the current IDAES workflow. Updated documentation is available at https://idaes-examples.readthedocs.org"
@ksbeattie ksbeattie added the Priority:High High Priority Issue or PR label Sep 21, 2023
@ksbeattie
Copy link
Member

This video in particular needs to be re-done.

@ksbeattie ksbeattie added help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers labels Nov 9, 2023
@ksbeattie
Copy link
Member

We should at the very least update the docs about the videos being out of date.

@ksbeattie
Copy link
Member

@aostace01 should now have access to the YouTube account to add a pointer to the current installation documentation.

@andrewlee94
Copy link
Member

@aostace01 Any update on this?

@aostace01
Copy link

@andrewlee94, @ksbeattie The video description states the idaes version for which the installation is demonstrated. We could add the text @lbianchi-lbl suggested above, and/or find volunteers to re-record the video.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed Priority:High High Priority Issue or PR User support
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants