Adding Linked data principles to the RAM

[ssteinbuss]

Following up on this discussion:

          @ssteinbuss thanks a lot for the clarifications! Here's what I captured from our discussion, please correct me if I got something wrong:

• Look in the Process layer: Vocabulary Hub in the Process Layer #208: vocabulary service in the process layer
• Plenty of these "Semantization" aspects are already covered
• in particular, how Data Providers can make Data Offerings that include Self-Describing data
• But there's no mechanism yet for Data Providers to collaborate to ensure that their Data Offerings are harmonized.
  This is an aspect of Data Space governance, eg to mandate they use CSVW for describing CSVs, particular ontologies, SHACL shapes, etc
• Can data spaces use Linked Data principles as alternative to Connectors (transferring data inbulk)?
  LD principles are not in RAM 4.0, but can be in the Whitepaper, and make it into RAM 5.0

Originally posted by @VladimirAlexiev in #236 (comment)

We should add the Linked data principles to the RAM and how to use them in data spaces, based on the semantic interoperability paper.