Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need for an archi(mate) model #131

Open
paulakeen opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Need for an archi(mate) model #131

paulakeen opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@paulakeen
Copy link

paulakeen commented Feb 20, 2023

Problem: Concepts like actors, business capabilities, digital services, specific solutions are referred to in the architecture model document in a very clear manner, but sometimes appear in the text mixed up (because they need to in order to clarify the message).

Suggestion:
Archi views with the Business, Functional, Processes, Information, and systems would be MOST appreciated. In these views, relations between the elements (e.g., roles hierachy) would be useful. Also, viewpoints showing how different elements from different views relate amongst themselves would prove most useful.

Alternatives:
Use alternative diagrammation/documentation tools, but keeping standard specification for import/export (Archimate, and/or UML 2).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant