You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Problem: Concepts like actors, business capabilities, digital services, specific solutions are referred to in the architecture model document in a very clear manner, but sometimes appear in the text mixed up (because they need to in order to clarify the message).
Suggestion:
Archi views with the Business, Functional, Processes, Information, and systems would be MOST appreciated. In these views, relations between the elements (e.g., roles hierachy) would be useful. Also, viewpoints showing how different elements from different views relate amongst themselves would prove most useful.
Alternatives:
Use alternative diagrammation/documentation tools, but keeping standard specification for import/export (Archimate, and/or UML 2).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem: Concepts like actors, business capabilities, digital services, specific solutions are referred to in the architecture model document in a very clear manner, but sometimes appear in the text mixed up (because they need to in order to clarify the message).
Suggestion:
Archi views with the Business, Functional, Processes, Information, and systems would be MOST appreciated. In these views, relations between the elements (e.g., roles hierachy) would be useful. Also, viewpoints showing how different elements from different views relate amongst themselves would prove most useful.
Alternatives:
Use alternative diagrammation/documentation tools, but keeping standard specification for import/export (Archimate, and/or UML 2).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: