Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python 3.6 or better compatibility #1877

Closed
tgreenhaw5 opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed

Python 3.6 or better compatibility #1877

tgreenhaw5 opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@tgreenhaw5
Copy link

Are there plans and/or a timeframe for supporting Python 3.6 or newer?

Many AI libraries including Spacy for natural language processing rely on newer versions of Python. Python 3.6 was released in 2016

@Lamparter
Copy link
Contributor

There's a lot of work going into supporting Python 3.6+, however it's very difficult.
You can take a look at the progress so far by looking at the docs where you can see the ticked boxes to see what's implemented.

The development for Python 3.6 is happening on the 3.6 branch.

@Lamparter
Copy link
Contributor

The more contributors the better, right now the project is maintained by @BCSharp and @slozier (big shoutout to them!), though working with a big codebase like this isn't easy.

That's what I aimed to do with #1815 (and following PRs), to make it more welcoming to contributors that IronPython desperately needs.

@IronLanguages IronLanguages locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2025
@BCSharp BCSharp converted this issue into discussion #1878 Jan 20, 2025

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants