-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What fio commands are being used? #130
Comments
Basically it calls the following with default GUI settings: fio
--output-format=json
--create_only=1
--filename=/location/of/test/file/KDM_20230922093345.txt 'Provide filepath on the disk/array volume where you want to run tests. Name of the file makes no difference.'
--size=1024m
--zero_buffers=0
--name=prepare
fio
--output-format=json
--ioengine=libaio
--randrepeat=0
--refill_buffers
--end_fsync=1
--direct=1
--rwmixread=70
--filename=/location/of/test/file/KDM_20230922093345.txt 'Must match filename option above.'
--name=read/write/rw/randread/randwrite/randrw 'Value depends on the specific test.'
--size=1024m 'Must match size parameter above.'
--zero_buffers=0
--bs=1m/4k 'Value depends on the test, but generally block size is 1MB for sequential test and 4KB for random test.'
--runtime=5
--rw=read/write/rw/randread/randwrite/randrw 'Matches name parameter.'
--iodepth=8/1/32/1 'Value depends on the specific test.'
--numjobs=1 See FIO manual for more information and explanation of each parameter. |
Thank you @igorpupkinable, your comment was very helpful. If anyone also finds it useful, I've shared a small script that runs and summarizes these fio results for several commonly run benchmarks: https://gist.github.com/JohnStarich/fb31b6657d8ad629e87df7a3c611c3bc |
Here is FIO JSON report parser in JavaScript with OK-ish output. https://gist.github.com/igorpupkinable/2e8f3327b6f4ac756aa86d6d72240b85 |
There isn't a discussion section on this repo, so I just had to ask in a issue.
Wanted to know what command is being used for these tests?
I am trying to re0plciate the same test at the CLI for testing ZFS pools, but cannot get anywhere near the same speeds (even on the same host as with your product) and I am not sure what I am missing...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: