You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey! I think the approach I'd like to take with Dagger is to have two different options for arrays:
Use a Dagger.DArray to wrap other arrays
Let packages implement their array functionality on top of Dagger or the DArray
For xarrays (which https://github.com/meggart/YAXArrays.jl seems to be the active Julia implemention; check the commit log), I think the latter option would probably make the most sense, since it seems like the xarray has some extra semantics and operations that regular AbstractArray subtypes don't implement. Option 1 is better for "simple" arrays like GPU arrays or various LinearAlgebra array types. There was discussion at JuliaIO/DiskArrays.jl#34 about integrating DiskArrays with Dagger, which I'd like to help support. Since DiskArrays is a dependency of YAXArrays, adding Dagger there should also provide features to YAXArrays.
Hi there,
Extremely excited about the potential of dagger and that the contributor base is growing.
In the long term, is there any plan for an API for working with labeled multi-dimensional data:
http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/getting-started-guide/why-xarray.html#core-data-structures
columns
andchannels
(higher dimensions).shape
,index
, anddtype
at each dimension.group_by
across across dimensions.It looks like these projects started but stopped:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: