Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Feature: Automatic porting of univariate special mathematical functions to the device. #63

Open
rdguerrerom opened this issue Nov 17, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@rdguerrerom
Copy link

rdguerrerom commented Nov 17, 2022

I am developing a methodology that will allow automatic code generation of approximant algorithms for computing arbitrary univariate special mathematical functions on the device with high speed at the cost of a controlled loss in accuracy. 

I wonder if this feature would be useful in a future release of OpenCL?

It could be used to port functions one at a time or to create a library of special mathematical functions. 

@rdguerrerom rdguerrerom changed the title Automatic porting of special mathematical functions to the device. New Feature: Automatic porting of univariate special mathematical functions to the device. Nov 17, 2022
@rdguerrerom
Copy link
Author

I am developing a methodology that will allow automatic code generation of approximant algorithms for computing arbitrary univariate special mathematical functions on the device with high speed at the cost of a controlled loss in accuracy. 

I wonder if this feature would be useful in a future release of OpenCL?

It could be used to port functions one at a time or to create a library of special mathematical functions.

@MathiasMagnus Can you reply to this, please?

@MathiasMagnus
Copy link
Collaborator

This sounds extremely useful indeed. Do you have some samples or a working branch somewhere one could look into.

Are you asking in context of it being part of the utility libraries?

I think any computing language is better with capable numeric features at the programmers fingertips.

@rdguerrerom
Copy link
Author

Thanks for answering @MathiasMagnus!

I was waiting for the opinion of one of you to create a branch and start moving my implementation there.
I am finishing the associated paper as well.

@rdguerrerom
Copy link
Author

@MathiasMagnus Do me a favor, can you help me to get more opinions about this proposal, please?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants