Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

human reads #57

Open
LisaHollstein opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

human reads #57

LisaHollstein opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@LisaHollstein
Copy link
Contributor

Right now the part that removes the human reads from the tables is missing, therefore those reads are present in the haybaler tables.

@colindaven
Copy link
Contributor

colindaven commented Aug 11, 2022

You mean this script, correct ?
bash runbatch_metagen_window_filter.sh

I wonder where the old Wochenende_postprocess removes these human reads (a haybaler section perhaps?),
because reporting uses bam.txt files (unfiltered) and haybaler uses reporting results.

@LisaHollstein
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, I meant that script. Interestingly, it seems to be run after haybaler in the Wochenende_postprocess, so I don't really know how there were no human reads in the haybaler csvs.

So my question is: Should there be human reads in the haybaler csvs or not? (I remember seeing csvs with them (a year ago) and some without (more recent))

@colindaven
Copy link
Contributor

I think Sophia excluded human reads in the python or bash scripts, maybe because she needed the numbers for normalization first, but not sure. Normalization should be done by the reporting steps.

You can see with this search that they are excluded with grep -v for the heatmaps and heat trees.

https://github.com/MHH-RCUG/haybaler/search?q=1_1_1

@colindaven
Copy link
Contributor

Ilona will know best if the human info is completely excluded or not and since when.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants