New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Growth protocol name #18

Open

PapoutsoglouE opened this issue Aug 7, 2019 · 1 comment

Collaborator

PapoutsoglouE commented Aug 7, 2019

The scope of Growth is too limited to hold all environment parameters. Ideally the protocol name should be Environment. Is this feasible?

(comment by @cpommier)

There is no issue with renaming the protocol. It was only named Growth because this is what the v1.0 configuration used.

Any further feedback?

DanFaria commented Aug 15, 2019 •

edited

Loading

Please note that:

the Growth protocol is used the cultivar practices (for which Growth makes more sense than Environment)
this protocol is only ONE of two ways in which to record environment parameters (it serves for parameters fixed throughout the study, as those that were measured regularly are to be recorded as observed variables & observations); in that sense, naming this Environment may mislead people into thinking they have to use this way necessarily.

So, my vote goes to keeping this as Growth protocol.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment