You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Context
The MetaMask extension and mobile applications each maintain separate implementations for most core wallet functionality. These separate implementations are an enormous maintenance burden, and an obstacle to building a more cohesive UX between all clients. By eliminating this duplication we can dramatically decrease the maintenance burden of the client teams and reduce the costs of future integrations.
This effort has been underway for months, and will continue beyond Q1. Progress towards the first milestone (shared controllers) is tracked here. The most substantial tasks in that milestone are the network, transaction, and keyring controller migrations. In the previous two quarters, we completed most of the network controller migration. Last quarter we also worked on the keyring controller migration, completing initial TypeScript migrations and planning tasks.
KR-2: Plan the transaction controller migration
The transaction controller is the last major difference between extension and mobile at the controller level. They differ substantially on their basic features, as well as on performance and network usage. Our goal for this quarter is to audit both transaction controllers and develop a plan for merging them while minimizing disruption to the client teams.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Context
The MetaMask extension and mobile applications each maintain separate implementations for most core wallet functionality. These separate implementations are an enormous maintenance burden, and an obstacle to building a more cohesive UX between all clients. By eliminating this duplication we can dramatically decrease the maintenance burden of the client teams and reduce the costs of future integrations.
This effort has been underway for months, and will continue beyond Q1. Progress towards the first milestone (shared controllers) is tracked here. The most substantial tasks in that milestone are the network, transaction, and keyring controller migrations. In the previous two quarters, we completed most of the network controller migration. Last quarter we also worked on the keyring controller migration, completing initial TypeScript migrations and planning tasks.
KR-2: Plan the transaction controller migration
The transaction controller is the last major difference between extension and mobile at the controller level. They differ substantially on their basic features, as well as on performance and network usage. Our goal for this quarter is to audit both transaction controllers and develop a plan for merging them while minimizing disruption to the client teams.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: