You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm a student and new to transcriptomic analyses. I used infer_experiment to verify the strandness of my paired-end RNA-Seq dataset but I can't figure out the meaning of the results regarding fr-unstranded, fr-firststrand, or fr-secondstrand for subsequent transcript assembly using Scallop.
This is PairEnd Data
Fraction of reads failed to determine: 0.1428
Fraction of reads explained by "1++,1--,2+-,2-+": 0.0090
Fraction of reads explained by "1+-,1-+,2++,2--": 0.8482
I found out that when the majority of reads are explained by "1+-,1-+,2++,2--", it means that the dataset is fr-firststrand, is that right?
Can you help me with some insights?
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello there,
I'm a student and new to transcriptomic analyses. I used infer_experiment to verify the strandness of my paired-end RNA-Seq dataset but I can't figure out the meaning of the results regarding
fr-unstranded
,fr-firststrand
, orfr-secondstrand
for subsequent transcript assembly using Scallop.This is PairEnd Data
Fraction of reads failed to determine: 0.1428
Fraction of reads explained by "1++,1--,2+-,2-+": 0.0090
Fraction of reads explained by "1+-,1-+,2++,2--": 0.8482
I found out that when the majority of reads are explained by
"1+-,1-+,2++,2--"
, it means that the dataset isfr-firststrand
, is that right?Can you help me with some insights?
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: