-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gene sorting compared to fasta #83
Comments
This behavior is related to biopython. Could you tell what version of biopython you use? |
Seems to be 1.80 |
Chiming in here. We noted the issue of contigs not being sorted according to the input order of the assembly file. The culprit here is not biopython, but rather BCBio.GFF. In EMBLmyGFF.py you have the following. At line line 1365:
I have verified that the input order is preserved. Later on, at line 1484:
is where the input order is scrambled.
By commenting out the line |
Excellent, thank you for the feedback @percyfal ! |
Describe the bug
When running EMBLmyGFF3 on a fasta file with a specific order of the genes, it re-orders the genes in the flat file output in what seems to be alphanumerical order based on the gene names. Input gene order is not retained.
General (please complete the following information):
To Reproduce
Any fasta+gff
Any input parameters
Expected behavior
To guarantee the gene order in the flat file output to be in the same order as in the fasta input
Screenshots
None
Additional context
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: