Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assimilate ATMS DBNet and ERAs data with the Normal feed data together in MPAS_JEDI #203

Open
xyzemc opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@xyzemc
Copy link
Contributor

xyzemc commented Oct 17, 2024

After confirmed the bufr2ioda converts the combined DBNet, ERAs and Normal feed ATMS bufr data correctly, I am starting to test and compare the result of assimilating the combined IODA data in MPAS JEDI with only assimilate Normal feed data.
For this testing, we will separately test the atms_n20*.yaml and atms_npp*.yaml.
To assimilate three ATMS bufr data together, the data conversion needs 2 steps:

  1. Read and write out bufr. In the python code , the Normal feed, DBNet, and ERAs bufr data will be read in with their own bufr table. Then write out to a combined bufr file with a new modified bufr table.
  2. Convert the new bufr file to IODA with bufr2ioda.x with the bug fixed bufr_query in PR: Fix scanline calculation for FFT used by ATMS remapping  bufr-query#24
@xyzemc xyzemc self-assigned this Oct 17, 2024
@xyzemc
Copy link
Contributor Author

xyzemc commented Oct 21, 2024

ATMS_N20 data Offline Domain Check
image

Total data count read in JEDI is 11479, but only channel 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,14 have data passed the QC :
image

@xyzemc
Copy link
Contributor Author

xyzemc commented Oct 21, 2024

Demo the result from channel 10:
OmB before QC:
image

OmB after QC:
image

Bias
image

@guoqing-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator

@xyzemc FYI, for the Offline Domain Check figure, it looks like you used an old version of the plotting script. Donnies updated that script so that the bottom box line takes the concave shape.

@xyzemc
Copy link
Contributor Author

xyzemc commented Oct 21, 2024

@xyzemc FYI, for the Offline Domain Check figure, it looks like you used an old version of the plotting script. Donnies updated that script so that the bottom box line takes the concave shape.

Thanks. I will check with Donny.

@xyzemc
Copy link
Contributor Author

xyzemc commented Oct 21, 2024

Analysis Potential Temperature increment at Level 20
image
Analysis Potential Temperature increment at Level 25
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants