Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fervo case study #202

Closed
softwareengineerprogrammer opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #204
Closed

Fervo case study #202

softwareengineerprogrammer opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #204
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or improvement (as opposed to bug/problem)

Comments

@softwareengineerprogrammer
Copy link
Collaborator

softwareengineerprogrammer commented May 7, 2024

Per #87

Papers:

  1. https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/5704/
  2. Drilling cost paper https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/GeoConf/papers/SGW/2024/Elsadi.pdf?t=1706897516
@softwareengineerprogrammer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Initial parameters & result merged in #203; Fervo_Norbeck_Latimer_2024.txt and Fervo_Norbeck_Latimer_2024.out are still considered work-in-progress until @kfbeckers and/or @malcolm-dsider further review & refine.

@softwareengineerprogrammer softwareengineerprogrammer linked a pull request May 8, 2024 that will close this issue
@softwareengineerprogrammer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

softwareengineerprogrammer commented May 9, 2024

Issue was automatically closed by merge of #204 - re-opened because PR was not fully reviewed by myself or additional geothermal SME

@HuihuiYangshell
Copy link

Thanks a lot, they are really helpful.

@softwareengineerprogrammer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Documenting @kfbeckers' current version of Project Cape Case Study for posterity:

Link: https://gtp.scientificwebservices.com/geophires?shared-geophires-result-id=c0bb86de-1356-4cab-9907-faf4005ecc3d

Input:

Reservoir Model, 1
Reservoir Volume Option, 1
Reservoir Density, 2800
Reservoir Depth, 8500 feet
Reservoir Heat Capacity, 1000
Reservoir Thermal Conductivity, 2.7
Number of Fractures, 100
Fracture Shape, 4
Fracture Height, 300
Fracture Width, 2400
Fracture Separation, 15
Number of Segments, 1
Gradient 1, 73
Plant Outlet Pressure, 1000 psi
Number of Injection Wells, 12
Number of Production Wells, 12
Well Geometry Configuration, 4
Has Nonvertical Section, True
Multilaterals Cased, True
Number of Multilateral Sections, 2
Total Nonvertical Length, 5000 feet
Production Flow Rate per Well, 98
Production Well Diameter, 8
Injection Well Diameter, 8
Well Separation, 365 feet
Injection Temperature, 60 degC
Injection Wellbore Temperature Gain, 3
Reservoir Impedance, 0.01
Ramey Production Wellbore Model, 1
Utilization Factor, .9
Water Loss Fraction, 0.02
Maximum Drawdown, 1
Ambient Temperature, 10 degC
Surface Temperature, 10 degC
End-Use Option, 1
Plant Lifetime, 15
Power Plant Type, 2
Circulation Pump Efficiency, 0.80
Exploration Capital Cost, 0
Well Drilling and Completion Capital Cost, 4.8
Reservoir Stimulation Capital Cost, 10
Economic Model, 3
Starting Electricity Sale Price, 0.15
Ending Electricity Sale Price, 1.00
Electricity Escalation Rate Per Year, 0.004053223
Electricity Escalation Start Year, 1
Fraction of Investment in Bonds, .5
Combined Income Tax Rate, .3
Gross Revenue Tax Rate, 0
Inflated Bond Interest Rate, .05
Inflated Equity Interest Rate, .08
Inflation Rate, .02
Investment Tax Credit Rate, 0
Inflation Rate During Construction, 0.05
Property Tax Rate, 0
Print Output to Console, 1
Time steps per year, 10

@softwareengineerprogrammer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Issue was automatically closed by merge of #204 - re-opened because PR was not fully reviewed by myself or additional geothermal SME

Resolved by #220

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or improvement (as opposed to bug/problem)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants