Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi, In my experience, if the rotor is constant, but the platform is changed, the same controller can be used with reasonably similar performance. I would have expected the power to be maintained, at least in a constant wind. It might be worth checking the time series for instabilities in the controller/model. Generally, FOWTs require floating feedback, unless it's a TLP. Then, you can get away without it. Here is some more information from a similar-sounding study: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/82038.pdf Best, Dan |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Dear all,
I am responsible for some newly designed floaters for 15MW scale wind turbines.
I am just wondering if I can still use the same DISCON.IN file generated for UMaine Volturn-US floater.
In my understanding, ROSCO toolbox is capable of tuning floating feedback control gain based on the .fst and .yaml files.
But I am curious about its impact on the different floaters but having the same rated power.
Indeed, I applied the VolturnUS model's DISCON.IN file to a different floater (w/ different water depth and mooring layout), it returns quite different power production performance which is about 20MW not 15MW. But when I turn off the floating feedback control, it gives me reasonable power output.
If anybody can share insight, I will really appreciate it.
Regards,
IL
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions