You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In PR #1823, test_prm_baseline_bldg13 failed in the CI test.
Debugging reviewed that the failure is caused by Surface 1624 and Surface 1666, 2 RoofCeilings in plenum space, have construction assigned as Ffactor Ground Floor 4_005, a Construction:FfactorGroundFloor object.
Due to the assignment of FfactorGroundFloor construction, the uFactor cannot be calculated and the test failed this specific line.
Digging deeper in the test model file: bldg_13.osm, both Surface 1624 and Surface 1666 have no Construction assigned, and they both adjacent to a surface that has construction of Ffactor Ground Floor 4_005. It seems in this case, OpenStudio assigns the adjacent surface's construction as default for these two surfaces - and this causes the error in the failed line mentioned above.
I want to understand the intent of having a roof ceiling adjacent to a floor in this test case, since it was never a problem until now, especially the changes in PR #1823 has nothing to do with what we found here. - should I update the code to accommodate this behavior or modify the test file?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In PR #1823,
test_prm_baseline_bldg13
failed in the CI test.Debugging reviewed that the failure is caused by
Surface 1624
andSurface 1666
, 2 RoofCeilings in plenum space, have construction assigned asFfactor Ground Floor 4_005
, aConstruction:FfactorGroundFloor
object.Due to the assignment of FfactorGroundFloor construction, the uFactor cannot be calculated and the test failed this specific line.
Digging deeper in the test model file: bldg_13.osm, both
Surface 1624
andSurface 1666
have no Construction assigned, and they both adjacent to a surface that has construction ofFfactor Ground Floor 4_005
. It seems in this case, OpenStudio assigns the adjacent surface's construction as default for these two surfaces - and this causes the error in the failed line mentioned above.I want to understand the intent of having a roof ceiling adjacent to a floor in this test case, since it was never a problem until now, especially the changes in PR #1823 has nothing to do with what we found here. - should I update the code to accommodate this behavior or modify the test file?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: