Aurora Update [2021-04-30] #575
Unanswered
alexauroradev
asked this question in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Aurora Update [2021-04-30]
The video of the call is available here
The forum discussion is available here
Agenda
Status, current goal
Working on preparing everything to Aurora release.
Planned items:
Weekly update
Alex Shevchenko
Arto Bendiken
eth_getLogs
, etc, which were blocking partners.Eugene Kapun
Eugene Ukhanov
Frank Braun
Investigated how often
BLOCKHASH
appears in contracts:evm-bully stats
command, but ran into issues with disassembler fromgo-ethereum
.BLOCKHASH
andDIFFICULTY
are not used often in production. Ethereum wants to remove these opcodes, because they lose their meaning in Eth2.While trying to fix the error the
evm-bully
got hung up last week I ran into weird error message fromnear-cli
aboutDeleteAccountWithLargeState
:near-cli
and implemented theevm-bully delete
command.near-cli
, but a limitation ofnearcore
which cannot be lifted: Cannot delete account with large state (Aurora Engine) near/nearcore#4265near-cli
to improve error message: Improve error message when attempting to delete large accounts near/near-cli#730Joshua J. Bouw
blockhash
, and bringing it back up. After much deliberate conversation, it was decided to return 0 for now and hand it off to Michael.gas_limit
was changed to return the max value.aurora-engine
docs lightly, filling in some of the gaps as required. Hadn't submitted anything for this yet as there were some other pressing matters. (with Arto)LOG
opcodes to be returned through the publicsubmit
method (which used to be calledraw_call
). (with Arto)Kirill Abramov
Marcelo Fornet
Matt Henderson
Michael Birch
BLOCKHASH
op-codePierre-Alain Ouvrard
Discussion
getAuroraTokenAddres(string nep141Account)
)Exit to Ethereum
precompile (bridgedTokenAddress, recipient, amount)approve
-- this can make us reuse the logic of Ethereum->NEAR brodging in the Aurora-native assets bridgingnearcore
limitation of deletion of the contracts / is that a problem for us?nearcore
with a custom parameter for the aboveNext week
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions