You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In nekRS a boundary type has to be specified for each boundary ID (tag).
If we import the boundary conditions from nek, there are usually no IDs available (unless the mesh comes from exodus or gmsh). In this case the IDs are derived from velocity boundary type (v, W, ...). This implies that on a given boundary ID the scalar boundary types cannot be different. This limitation might be unexpected from a nek user perspective.
I cannot think of a good fix for this. At the very least we should check if the number of boundary IDs match and bail out otherwise.
Suggested workaround: define boundary IDs in nek and specify types in par
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In nekRS a boundary type has to be specified for each boundary ID (tag).
If we import the boundary conditions from nek, there are usually no IDs available (unless the mesh comes from exodus or gmsh). In this case the IDs are derived from velocity boundary type (v, W, ...). This implies that on a given boundary ID the scalar boundary types cannot be different. This limitation might be unexpected from a nek user perspective.
I cannot think of a good fix for this. At the very least we should check if the number of boundary IDs match and bail out otherwise.
Suggested workaround: define boundary IDs in nek and specify types in par
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: