Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the links in the nixos-iso-gnome-r13y report don't work (404) #3

Open
raboof opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

the links in the nixos-iso-gnome-r13y report don't work (404) #3

raboof opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@raboof
Copy link
Member

raboof commented Apr 4, 2023

At https://reproducible.nixos.org/nixos-iso-gnome-r13y/

@Artturin
Copy link
Member

Artturin commented Apr 4, 2023

maybe because of

Generated at 2023-01-17 20:12:00.741034048 UTC from https://github.com/grahamc/r13y.com.

@raboof
Copy link
Member Author

raboof commented Apr 4, 2023

No, it's just that I didn't check these in ;).

The reason for that is that those diffs add up to 2.6G of data - they'd quickly make this git repo unusable. You can find them for now at https://nix-rb.bzzt.net/nixos-iso-gnome-r13y/

Those diffs (for example https://nix-rb.bzzt.net/nixos-iso-gnome-r13y/diff/ef5674a9182ebc05cb0bcdf02835a7fa877cc6c7c7883f5892809839e1a7db60-7b27a03cbe820735217685005e4683b60e7d471d8d484d19d63be0b92329afa7.html) are basically too big to be of any use anyway, so we should find a better way to create/truncate/...? them.

@Artturin
Copy link
Member

Artturin commented Apr 4, 2023

ghc isn't reproducible at all so perhaps ignore the ones with ghc in the path as they just add noise, i think we discussed about making a separate category for them so possibly fixable and non fixable ones could be separated, i don't remember where that was discussed

@raboof
Copy link
Member Author

raboof commented May 12, 2023

ghc isn't reproducible at all

Interestingly some haskell packages appear to be reproducible, but indeed a ton of them aren't - refs NixOS/nixpkgs#151347

so perhaps ignore the ones with ghc in the path as they just add noise, i think we discussed about making a separate category for them

Yes, that would be good. Unfortunately they don't have ghc in the path :) . We can do that once we show attribute paths instead of derivation paths where possible, though (https://codeberg.org/raboof/nix-reproducible-builds-report/issues/1)

i don't remember where that was discussed

I think it was on Matrix, but we should track such things in issues. created https://codeberg.org/raboof/nix-reproducible-builds-report/issues/3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants