You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tested 5 random dates between old and new pipeline and the file values seem to be exactly the same which is great!
One thing i noticed was that the print out of the new pipeline files does not include any pixel summary stats. I think this is actually true for all rasters coming out of this repo and has to do w/ the way the COGS are being written. You can see in the code snippet below that all we see is ? for min/max.
It's not really a make or break feature, but they can be a pretty handy way to quickly check the data exists and raster is read in properly - also it' odd that this metadata is not present as it's standard with most cogs (this is the first time i've seen it missing).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I tested 5 random dates between old and new pipeline and the file values seem to be exactly the same which is great!
One thing i noticed was that the print out of the new pipeline files does not include any pixel summary stats. I think this is actually true for all rasters coming out of this repo and has to do w/ the way the COGS are being written. You can see in the code snippet below that all we see is
?
for min/max.It's not really a make or break feature, but they can be a pretty handy way to quickly check the data exists and raster is read in properly - also it' odd that this metadata is not present as it's standard with most cogs (this is the first time i've seen it missing).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: