Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can you use different data sources to calculate status and trend? #32

Open
jules32 opened this issue Aug 14, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Can you use different data sources to calculate status and trend? #32

jules32 opened this issue Aug 14, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@jules32
Copy link
Contributor

jules32 commented Aug 14, 2018

Ideally, you will calculate status and trend scores with the same data layers: you would calculate status for the most recent 5 years with 5 years of data for each of the data layers used in that goal model. Then, you will report the most recent year as the status score, and calculate the trend of status scores for the most recent 5 years, and report that as the trend score.

However, sometimes there is not adequate data through time for all data layers involved in the status models. This has been the case in with some of the global habitat layers. In some cases we calculated status for the present year only, and calculated trend from data that could reasonably track habitat trend. We have used the inverse of coastal population in the past, under the assumption that more people mean less mangroves.

@jules32 jules32 changed the title Can you use different data sets to calculate status and trend? Can you use different data sources to calculate status and trend? Aug 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant